The perception of innovation in internationalization at home in brazilian public universities
- Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): V. 24, N. 2 (2025)
- Submitted: Oct 14, 2025
- Published: Jul 23, 2026
- DOI 10.25189/rabralin.v24i2.2385
Abstract
This study aims to map innovative internalization at home practices from the perspectives of stakeholders involved in Brazilian Higher Education. Based on the premise of Filippetti, Frenz, and Ietto-Gillies (2011, p. 439), who argue that "the connection between innovation and internationalization has a strong theoretical basis," the study explored the possibility of exploring the Brazilian context to identify innovative internationalization actions considered best practices. The text also considers the premise of Buckner and Stein (2020, p. 163), who argue that identifying best practices for internationalization is a complex process. In light of these two perspectives, the data collected demonstrate that these are not exactly best practices, but rather possible practices that make institutional sense and represent a necessary shift in the internationalization process. This is a robust study involving 70 public, state, and federal higher education institutions located in 23 Brazilian states. The analysis was primarily qualitative, involving the international relations directorates of the participating institutions, as well as the heads of international relations offices, faculty, administrative staff, and office staff. They responded to a semi-structured questionnaire that included questions related to institutional concepts of innovation and innovative internationalization practices within their own institutions. This analysis can contribute to the short- and long-term planning that several Brazilian higher education institutions should develop to advance their internationalization processes.
References
BARANZELI, C. Modelo de internacionalização em casa – IaH. In: MOROSINI, M. (Org.). Interfaces da Educação a Distância na Internacionalização em casa. 2019. p. 187-201. ISBN 978-85-397-1305-9.
BEELEN, J.; JONES, E. Redefining internationalization at home. In: CURAJ, A et. al. (Ed.) The European Higher Education Area, 2015. p. 59-73.
BUCKNER, E.; STEIN, S. What counts as internationalization? Deconstructing the internationalization imperative. Journal of Studies in International Education, v. 24, n. 2, 2020. p. 151-166.
CHRISTENSEN, C. M.; EYRING, H. J. The innovative university: changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2011.
DEGRAFF, J.; DEGRAFF, S. The innovation code: the creative power of constructive conflict. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2017.
DE WIT, H. Internationalisation in higher education, a critical review. Simon Fraser University Educational Review, v. 12, n. 3, Fall 2019. p. 9-17.
FILIPPETTI, A.; FRENZ, M.; GILLES, G. I. Are innovation and internationalization related? An analysis of European countries. Industry and Innovation, v. 18, n. 5, 2011. p. 437-459.
GIBSON, R. The 4 lenses of innovation: a powerful tool for creative thinking. New Jersey: Wiley, 2015.
GOMES. M. R. O.; GUERRA, T. Políticas de integração e cooperação técnica das instituições de ensino superior – perspectiva UNESCO. In: GOROVITZ, S.; UNTERBÄUMEN, E. H. (Org.) Políticas e tendências de internacionalização no ensino superior no Brasil. Brasília (DF): Editora UNB, 2018. (p. 31-44)
GULICHEVA, E.; LISIN, E.; OSIPOVA, M.; KHABDULLIN, A. Leading factors in the formation of innovative education environment. Journal of International Studies, v. 10, n. 2, 2017. p. 129-137.
HUDZIK, J. K. Comprehensive internationalization: institutional pathways to success. Oxon; New York: Routledge, 2015.
IMBER, A. The innovation formula: the 14 science-based keys for creating a culture where innovation thrives. Melbourne: Wiley, 2016.
KNIGHT, J. Internacionalização da educação superior: conceitos, tendências e desafios. 2 ed. E-book. São Leopoldo: Oikos Editora, 2020. 221 p.
MERJTOFT, T.; CRIPPS, H.; BLÖCKER, C. Internationalization at home: an international interdisciplinary experience. Proceedings 8:e Utvecklingskonferensen för Sveriges ingenjörsutbildningar, Karlstads universitet, 2021.
MIRCI, P. S.; HENSLEY, P. A. Leading for innovative practice: melding theories of organizational change, adult learning and conditions of learning. CAPEA Education Leadership and administration, v. 22, 2011. p. 9-30.
MISSERE MIHAS, T. Intercultural Encounters: creating purposeful interactions between domestic and international students. The Organizational Improvement Plan at Western University, 2021. 129 p.
RAFFAELI, R.; GLYNN, M. A. Institutional Innovation: novel, useful and legitimate. In: SHALLEY, C. E.; HITT, M. A.; ZHOU, J. (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. p. 407-420.
RAUERM J. N.; KROISS, M.; KRYVINSKA, N.; NOVITZKI, C. E.; ABURAIA, M. Cross-university virtual teamwork as a means of internationalization at home. The International Journal of Management Education, v. 19, 2021. p. 1-13.
SANTOS, G. M. T.; REIS, J. P. C. COVID-19 e internacionalização em casa: potencialidades para o proces de ensino-aprendizagem na Educação Superior. Boletim de Conjunturas, v. 4, n. 11, 2020. p. 19-27.
SANTOS JORGE, M. L. Internacionalização em casa e educação para a cidadania global: primeiras aproximações. In: VIANA, R. S.; LARANJEIRA, D. A. (Org.). Internacionalização do Ensino Superior: concepções e experiências. BH: Editora UEMG, 2018.
VALTINS, K.; TIPANS, I.; MURACOVA, M. Technology enhanced internationalization in higher education, non-traditional indicators. Journal of Information Technology Management, v. 12, n. 3, 2020. p. 14-25.