Footing and TRP - The informal architecture of C-ORAL-BRASIL I under a socio(inter)actional

Sineide Gonçalves
PDF XML

Abstract

This article contemplates the dynamic aspect that guides and organizes interpersonal relationships in microecological events that Goffman (1979) called footing and considers the exact moment of shift alternation that linguists like Sacks, Schegloff and Jefferson (1974; 2003), Marcuschi (2003) and Couper-Kuhlen and Selting (2018) call it TRP (Place of Relevance for Transition). The objective is to verify in two spontaneous speech files of C-ORAL-BRASIL I, “bfamcv02” and “bfamcv05”, whether the RPT of the TCUs (Shift Construction Units) constituted in the speeches in interaction causes footing changes. To achieve this goal, an interface was developed between prosody, Hirst e Di Cristo (1998), Bolinger (1986), Halliday (1967), Robert D. Ladd (2008 [1996]), Gumperz (1988) and Selting (1995), and the theoretical perspectives that best explain the structuring of a spoken interaction: Conversation Analysis, Interactional Linguistics and Interactional Sociolinguistics, Sacks, Schegloff and Jefferson (1974; 2003), Marcuschi (1988; 2003; 2008), Couper-Kuhlen and Selting (2018), Goffman (1972; 1974; 1798; 198), Gumperz (1982; 1989) and Tannen e Wallat (1987). Therefore, the analyses were performed based on socio-interactional and suprasegmental aspects and the results showed that the RPT verified in the TCUs elaborated in the two communicative situations chosen for this article causes footing changes.

Full-text of the article is available for this locale: Português (Brasil).

References

AUSTIN, John. Sense and Sensibilia. Londres: Cambridge University Press. Vol. 38, n. 145, p. 242-252, 1963.

BARBOSA, Thalita S. V. Sobreposição de fala em diálogos: um estudo fonético-acústico. 2015. 109 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Estudos da Linguagem) – UNICAMP, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 2013.

BOLINGER, D. Intonation end its parts. London: Edward Arnold Publishers, 1986.

BRAIT, Elisabeth. O processo interacional. In: PRETI, Dino (org.) Análise de Textos Orais. São Paulo: Projeto NURC/SP – FFLCH-USP, 4 ed., p. 189-214, 1993.

CAGLIARI, Luis Carlos. Análise fonológica: introdução à teoria e à prática. Campinas: Mercado das Letras, 2002.

CHAFE, W. Creativity in verbalization and its implications for the nature of stored knowledge. In: FREEDLE, R (Org.). Discourse production and comprehension. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex, p. 41-55, 1977.

COSERIU, Eugênio. Fundamentos e tarefas da sócio e etnolinguística. In: MELLO, Linalda Arruda. (Org.). Sociedade, Cultura e Língua: Ensaios de Sócio e Etnolinguística. João Pessoa: Shorin, 1990.

DU BOIS, John W. The stance triangle. In: ENGLEBRETSON, Robert (org.). Stancetaking in discourse: subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, p. 139–182, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.

DU BOIS, John W.; KÄRKKÄINEN, Elise. Taking a stance on emotion: affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk, vol. 32, p. 433–451, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0021.

FRAKE, C. O. The ethnographic study of cognitive systems. In: TYLER, S. A. (Org.). Cognitive anthropology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, p. 28-41, 1969.

FRENCH, P.; LOCAL, J. Turn-competitive incomings. In: Journal of Pragmatics, vol.7, p. 701-715, 1983.

FILMORE. C. J. Proceeding of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Linguistics Department, University of California, p. 123-132, 1975.

FORD, C.; FOX, B.; THOMPSON, S. The language of turn and sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

FORD, C.; FOX, B.; THOMPSON, S. Practices in the construction of turns: The “TCU” revisited. Pragmatics, vol. 6, n. 3, p. 427–454, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.3.07for.

GOFFMAN, Erving. Frame analyses. Reprint. Originally published: New York: Harper E Row, 1974.

GOFFMAN, Erving. Footing. In: RIBEIRO, B. T.; GARCEZ, P. M. (Orgs.) Sociolinguistica Interacional. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 2013, p.107-148.

GONÇALVES, Sineide. As práticas discursivas de Marília Gabriela em entrevistas com atores considerados galãs da TV brasileira. 2015. 114 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Estudos Linguísticos) – ICHS, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Mariana, 2015.

GUMPERZ, J. J. Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press, 1982.

HALLIDAY, M. A. K. Intonation in english grammar. In: Transactions of the phylological society, p. 143-169, 1964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1963.tb01003.x.

HIRST, Daniel; CRISTO, Di Albert. Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages. United Kingdon: Cambridge University Press, 1998. https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1353%2Flan.2000.0088.

HIRST, D. Form and Function in the Representation of Speech Prosody. Speech Communication, 46, pp. 334-347, 2005.

HYMES, D. Ways of speaking. In: BAUMAN, R.; SHERZER, J. (Orgs.) Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 433-51, 1974.

JAMES, W. Principles of psychology. New York: Dover, 1950, Vol. 2, p. 292-293.

JEFFERSON, G. Preliminary Notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In: ROGER, D.; BULL, P. (Orgs.). Conversation, and Interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon Multilingual Matters Ltd, Vol.3, p. 166-196. 1989.

LADD, D. R. Intonational Phonology. 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

LEITE, Délia Ribeiro. Estudo prosódico sobre as manifestações de foco. 2009. 146 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Estudos Linguísticos) – UFMG – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2009.

LEVINSON. S. Pragmática. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.

MARCUSCHI, L. A. Perspectivas dos estudos em interação na Linguística brasileira dos anos 90. Recife: (mimeo), 1998.

MARCUSCHI, Luiz A. Análise da conversação. 5 ed. São Paulo: Editora Afiliada, 2003.

MARCUSCHI, Luiz Antônio. Produção textual, análise de gêneros e compreensão. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2008.

MINSKY, M. A framework for representing knowledge. In: WINSTON, P. H. (Org.). The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw Hill, p. 211-277, 1975.

PIKE, K. L. The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: The Michigan University Press, 1945.

RASO, T.; MELLO, H. R. (Eds.). C-ORAL-BRASIL I: Corpus de referência do português

brasileiro falado informal. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2012.

RASO, T.; MITTMANN, M. M. As principais medidas da fala. In: RASO, T.; MELLO, H. R. (Eds.). C-ORAL-BRASIL I: Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 2012.

RIBEIRO, B. T.; GARCEZ, P. M. (org.). Sociolinguística Interacional. Porto 3 Ed. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 2013.

RUMELHART, D. E. Notes on a schema for stories. In: D. C. Bobrow & A. Collins (Orgs.). Representation and understanding. New York: Academic Press, p. 211-236, 1975.

SACKS, Harvey; SCHEGLOFF, Emanuel A.; JEFFERSON, Gail. Sistemática Elementar para a organização da tomada de turnos para a conversa. Juiz de Fora: Veredas, v. 7, n. 1-2, 2003. Tradução de Maria Clara Castellões de Oliveira. Language, 1974, v. 50, p. 696-735. A Simplest Systematic for the Organization of Turn taking for Conversation.

SCHANK, R. C.; ABELSON, R. P. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1977.

SCHEGLOFF, E.A. Reflections on Studying Prosody in Talk-in-interaction. In: Language and Speech. California: University of California, vol.41, p. 235-263, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002383099804100402.

SCHEGLOFF, Emanuel A. Sequence Organization in Interaction. v.1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

SCHUTZ, Alfred. Símbolo, realidade e sociedade. In: NATANSON, Maurice (Ed.). Artigos coletados: O problema da realidade social. The Hague: Nijhoff, vol. I, p. 287-356, 1962.

SELTING et al. Um sistema para transcrever a fala-em-interação: GAT 2. Veredas atemática. Juiz de Fora. V. 20, n. 2, p. 06-61. 2016.

SELTING, Margret; COUPER-KUHLEN, Elizabeth. Studies in Interational Linguístics. New Kingdon: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

SELTING, Margret, AUER, Peter, BARTH-WEINGARTEN, Dagmar, BERGMANN, Jörg, BERGMANN, Pia, BIRKNER, Karin, COUPER-KUHLEN, Elizabeth, DEPPERMANN, Arnulf, GILLES, Peter, GÜNTHNER, Susanne, HARTUNG, Martin, KERN, Friederike, MERTZLUFFT, Christine, MEYER, Christian, MOREK, Miriam, OBERZAUCHER, Frank, PETERS, Jörg, QUASTHOFF, Uta, SCHÜTTE, Wilfried, STUKENBROCK, Anja, UHMANN, Susanne. Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung 10, p. 353-402, 2009. Disponível em: www.gespraechsforschung-ozs. acessado em outubro de 2019.

TANNEN, Deborah; WALLAT, Cynthia. Enquadres interativos e esquemas de conhecimento em interação: Exemplos de um exame/consulta médica. In: RIBEIRO, Branca Telles; GARCEZ, Pedro M. (Orgs.). Sociolinguística Interacional. 2 ed. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 2013, cap. 7, p. 183-214.

WELLS, B.; MACFARLANE, S. Prosody as an Interactional Resource: Turn-Projection and Overlp. In: Language and Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, vol. 41, no. 3-4, p. 265-294, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002383099804100403.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. São Paulo: Editora da USP, 1922.