• slot resmi
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot88
  • raja168
  • agenrp
  • slot gacor
  • nagarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • agenrp
  • raja168
  • fijislot
  • emas288
  • bos288
  • raja168
  • bos288
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • emas288
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • To read beyond the word: instruments for the analysis of political discourses

    Leonardo da Silva

    Abstract

    This review critically discusses the conference Linguistic Instruments for the analysis of political discourse given by professor Uli Reich during the event Abralin ao Vivo, in which the author presents linguistic concepts from the field of formal pragmatics that may be used to unveil the ideology behind texts and utterances. More specifically, Reich presents the concepts of common ground (STALNAKER, 2002), Questions under discussion (ROBERTS, 2012), conventional implicatures (POTTS, 2005) and “table” (FARKAS; BRUCE, 2010), and then analyzes excerpts from the interministerial meeting held by Jair Bolsonaro’s government on April 22nd, 2020. Through the analysis, the linguist demonstrates which common grounds are projected by the discourses of the interlocutors present in the meeting. Reich’s talk, besides being a class about the role of Linguistics in the understanding of contemporaneity, provides us with tools for the development of a critical reading of the world.

    References

    FARKAS, Donka e BRUCE, Kim B. On Reacting to Assertions and Polar Questions. Journal of Semantics 27, n. 1, p. 81-118, 2010.

    FREIRE, Paulo. A importância do ato de ler em três artigos que se completam. 51ºed. São Paulo: Cortez Editora, 2011.

    INSTRUMENTOS Linguísticos para Análise do Discurso Político. Conferência apresentada por Uli Reich. [S.l., s.n.], 2020. 1 vídeo (1h 21min). Publicado pelo canal da Associação Brasileira de Linguística. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yjpi1XV0M1Y&t=459s. Acesso em: 05 julho 2020.

    POTTS, Christopher. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

    ROBERTS, Craige. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5(6): 1-69, 2012.(1996 version: OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49. The Ohio State University.)

    STALNAKER, Robert. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, s.l., ano 25, p. 701-721, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902