Efficient trade-offs as explanations in functional linguistics: some problems and an alternative proposal
- V. 19, N. 3 (2020)
- Enviado: out. 23, 2020
- Publicado: dez. 17, 2020
- DOI 10.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1728
Resumo
The notion of efficient trade-offs is frequently used in functional linguistics in order to explain language use and structure. In this paper I argue that this notion is more confusing than enlightening. Not every negative correlation between parameters represents a real trade-off. Moreover, trade-offs are usually reported between pairs of variables, without taking into account the role of other factors. These and other theoretical issues are illustrated in a case study of linguistic cues used in expressing “who did what to whom”: case marking, rigid word order and medial verb position. The data are taken from the Universal Dependencies corpora in 30 languages and annotated corpora of online news from the Leipzig Corpora collection. We find that not all cues are correlated negatively, which questions the assumption of language as a zero-sum game. Moreover, the correlations between pairs of variables change when we incorporate the third variable. Finally, the relationships between the variables are not always bidirectional. The study also presents a causal model, which can serve as a more appropriate alternative to trade-offs.
Referências
ARIEL, Mira. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge, 1990.
ARIEL, Mira. “Or Constructions: Monosemy versus polysemy”. In: MacWhinney, Brian; MALCHUKOV, Andrej; MORAVCSIK, Edith A., Competing Motivations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014, p. 333-347. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709848.001.0001
BAAYEN, R. Harald; MILIN, Petar; RAMSCAR, Michael. Frequency in lexical processing. Aphasiology, 30(11), p. 1174–1220, 2016. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1147767
BAUER, Brigitte M. “Word order”. In: BALDI, Philip; CUZZOLIN, Pierluigi. New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax: Vol 1: Syntax of the Sentence. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009, p. 241-316.
BLASI, Damián E.; ROBERTS, Seán G. “Beyond binary dependencies in language structure”. In: ENFIELD, Nick J., Dependencies in Language. Berlin: Language Science Press, 2017, p. 117–128. DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.573774
CLARK, Herbert H. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
CLARK, Herbert H.; WILKES-GIBBS, Diana. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1), p. 1-39, 1986. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7
CROFT, William A. On being a student of Joe Greenberg. Linguistic Typology, 6(1), p. 3–8, 2002. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2002.001
DELBRÜCK, Berthold. Einleitung in das Studium der indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel. 5th ed, 1908. https://archive.org/details/einleitungindas00delbgoog
DU BOIS, John. “Competing motivations”. In: HAIMAN, John. Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1985, p. 343-365.
FEDZECHKINA, Maryia; NEWPORT, Elissa L.; JAEGER, T. Florian. Balancing Effort and Information Transmission During Language Acquisition: Evidence From Word Order and Case Marking. Cognitive Science, 41(2), p. 416-446, 2016. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12346
FENK-OCZLON, Gertraud; FENK, August. “Complexity trade-offs between the subsystems of language”. In: MIESTAMO, Matti; SINNEMÄKI, Kaius; Karlsson, Fred, Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008, p. 43–65.
FERRER-I-CANCHO, Ramon. Why do syntactic links not cross? Europhysics Letters, 76(6), p. 1228-1234, 2006. DOI https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2006-10406-0
FERRER-I-CANCHO, Ramon. The placement of the head that maximizes predictability. An information theoretic approach. Glottometrics, 39, p. 38-71, 2017. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12346
GELL-MANN, Murray. What is complexity? Complexity, 1(1), p. 16-19, 1995. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.6130010105
GIBSON, Edward. “The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity”. In: MARANTZ, Alec P.; MIYASHITA, Yasushi; O’NEIL, Wayne, Image, Language, Brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000, p 95–126.
GIBSON, Edward; FUTRELL, Richard; PIANTADOSI, Steven; DAUTRICHE, Isabelle; MAHOWALD, Kyle; BERGEN, Leon; Levy, ROGER. How Efficiency Shapes Human Language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 23(5), p. 389-407, 2019. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003
GOLDHAHN, Dirk; ECKART, Thomas; QUASTHOFF, Uwe. “Building Large Monolingual Dictionaries at the Leipzig Corpora Collection: From 100 to 200 Languages”. In: CALZOLARI, Nicoletta; CHOUKRI, Khalid; DECLERCK, Thierry; et al., Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Istanbul: ELRA, 2012, p. 759-765. http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/pdf/327_Paper.pdf
GREENBERG, Joseph H. Language Universals, With Special Reference to Feature
Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton, 1966a.
GREENBERG, Joseph H. “Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the
order of meaningful elements”. In: GREENBERG, Joseph H., Universals of grammar,
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1966b, p. 73-113.
HAIMAN, John. Iconic and economic motivation. Language, 59(4), p. 781-819, 1983.
HALE, John. Uncertainty about the rest of sentence. Cognitive Science, 30(4), p. 643-672, 2006. DOI https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_64
HALL, Matthew L.; MAYBERRY, Rachel I.; FERREIRA, Victor S. Cognitive constraints on constituent order: evidence from elicited pantomime. Cognition, 129(1), p. 1-17, 2013. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.004
HARMON, Zara; KAPATSINSKI, Vsevolod. Putting old tools to novel uses: The role of form accessibility in semantic extension. Cognitive Psychology, 98, p. 22-44, 2017, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.08.002
HASPELMATH, Martin. “Creating economical morphosyntactic patterns in
language change”. In: GOOD, Jeff, Language Universals and Language Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 185-214.
HASPELMATH, Martin. “On system pressure competing with economic motivation”. In: MacWhinney, Brian; MALCHUKOV, Andrej; MORAVCSIK, Edith A., Competing Motivations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014, p. 197-208.
HASPELMATH, Martin; KARJUS, Andres. Explaining asymmetries in number marking: Singulatives, pluratives and usage frequency. Linguistics, 55(6), p. 1213-1235, 2017. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0026
HAWKINS, John. A Comparative Typology of English and German. Unifying the contrasts. London: Croom Helm, 1986.
HAWKINS, John. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
HENGEVELD, Kees; LEUFKENS, Sterre. Transparent and non-transparent languages. Folia Linguistica, 52(1), p. 139–175, 2018. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2018-0003
HOLLER, Judith; KENDRICK, Kobin H.; LEVINSON, Stephen C. Processing language in face-to-face conversation: Questions with gestures get faster responses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), p. 1900-1908, 2018. DOI https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1363-z.
HOLLER, Judith; LEVINSON, Stephen C. Multimodal language processing in human communication. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(8), p. 639-652, 2019. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.006
JÄGER, Gerhard. Evolutionary Game Theory and Typology. A Case Study. Language, 83(1), p. 74-109, 2007.
JAEGER, T. Florian. Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 61(1), 23-62, 2010. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002
JAEGER, T. Florian; BUZ, Esteban. “Signal reduction and linguistic encoding”. In: Fernández, Eva M.; SMITH CAIRNS, Helen, The Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2017, p. 38-81. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118829516.ch3
JAEGER, T. Florian; TILY, Harry J. On language “utility”: Processing complexity and communicative efficiency. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(3), p. 323–335, 2011. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.126
KALISH, Markus; MÄCHLER, Martin; COLOMBO, Diego; MAATHUIS, Marloes H.; BÜHLMANN, Peter. Causal Inference Using Graphical Models with the R Package pcalg. Journal of Statistical Software, 47(11), p. 1-26, 2012. DOI https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v047.i11
KELLER, Rudi. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge, 1994.
KEMP, Charles; XU, Yang; REGIER, Terry. Semantic Typology and Efficient Communication. Annual Review of Linguistics 4, p. 109-128, 2018. DOI https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045406
KIPARSKY, Paul. “The Shift to Head-initial VP in Germanic”. In: THRÁINSSON, Höskuldur; EPSTEIN, Samuel D.; PETER, Steve, Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996, p. 140-179.
KOCH, Monika. A Demystification of Syntactic Drift. Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, p. 63-114, 1974.
KOPLENIG, Alexander; MEYER, Peter; WOLFER, Sascha; MÜLLER-SPITZER, Carolin. 2017. The statistical trade-off between word order and word structure – Large-scale evidence for the principle of least effort. PLoS ONE, 12(3), e0173614, 2017. DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173614
KURUMADA, Chigusa; JAEGER, T. Florian. Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case-marking in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language 83, p. 152-178, 2015. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.003
LEVSHINA, Natalia. Towards a Theory of Communicative Efficiency in Human Languages. Habilitation thesis. Leipzig University, 2018. DOI http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1542857
LEVSHINA, Natalia. Token-based typology and word order entropy. Linguistic Typology, 23(3), p. 533–572, 2019. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-0025
LEVSHINA, Natalia. In preparation. Bounded rationality and limited efficiency: A correlational and causal analysis of subject and object cues in thirty languages.
MARTINET, André. Grundzüge der Allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1963.
MCWHORTER, John H. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology, 5(2-3), p. 125-166, 2001. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2001.001
PIANTADOSI, Steven T.; TILY, Harry; GIBSON, Edward. Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. PNAS, 108(9), p. 3526–3529, 2011. DOI https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012551108
PIANTADOSI, Steven T.; TILY, Harry; GIBSON, Edward. The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cognition, 122, p. 280-291, 2012. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004
RÓŻCKA-TRAN, Joanna; BOSKI, Paweł; WOJCISZKE, Bogdan. Belief in a zero-sum game as a social axiom: A 37-Nation Study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 46(4), p. 525–48, 2015. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115572226
SAPIR, Edward. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, 1921.
SHOSTED, Ryan K. Correlating complexity: A typological approach. Linguistic Typology, 10(1), p. 1-40, 2006. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2006.001
SINNEMÄKI, Kaius. “Complexity trade-offs in core argument marking”. In: MIESTAMO, Matti; SINNEMÄKI, Kaius; Karlsson, Fred, Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008, p. 67–88.
SINNEMÄKI, Kaius. Word order in zero-marking languages. Studies in Language 34(4), p. 869-912, 2010. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.4.04sin
SINNEMÄKI, Kaius. Language universals and linguistic complexity. Three case studies in core argument marking. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki, 2011.
SINNEMÄKI, Kaius. “Complexity trade-offs: A case study”. In: NEWMEYER, Frederick J.; PRESTON, Laurel B., Measuring Grammatical Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, p. 179–201.
SPIRTES, Peter; GLYMOUR, Clark; SCHEINES, Richard. Causation, Prediction, and Search. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
WIJFFELS, Jan. udpipe: Tokenization, Parts of Speech Tagging, Lemmatization and Dependency Parsing with the UDPipe NLP Toolkit. R package version 0.8.4-1. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=udpipe
WRIGHT, Robert. Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny. New York: Pantheon, 2000.
ZEMAN, Daniel; NIVRE, Joakim; ABRAMS, Mitchell; et al., 2020, Universal Dependencies 2.6, LINDAT/CLARIAH-CZ digital library at the Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics (ÚFAL), Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-3226.
ZIPF, George. The Psychobiology of Language: An Introduction to Dynamic Philology. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1965[1935].
ZIPF, George. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison–Wesley, 1949.