On the semantics of 'em': polysemy in the prepositional system of Brazilian Portuguese
- V. 25, N. 2 (2026)
- Submitted: Oct 15, 2025
- Published: Sep 18, 2026
- DOI 10.25189/rabralin.v25i2.2393
Abstract
The preposition ‘em’ is the most frequently used spatial item in Brazilian Portuguese (Ilari et al., 2015), a fact often attributed to its high degree of polysemy (Oliveira & GoodGod, 2018; Rodrigues et al. 2020). This paper aims to investigate the polysemy of ‘em’ within the theoretical frameworks of Nanosyntax and Formal Semantics, with a focus on understanding how its different interpretations arise from the interaction between formal features of syntactic computation, encyclopedic knowledge and pragmatics. Methodologically, the analysis combines nanosyntactic decomposition of the universal functional sequence (f-seq) with semantic diagnostics, enabling us to identify which spatial properties are formally encoded and which emerge from conceptual or pragmatic factors. We propose that the notions of adjacency, contact, and inclusion, widely recognized in the descriptive literature, should be treated as independent features in the f-seq, built incrementally. Within this perspective, the core interpretations associated with ‘em’ can be derived through the Superset Effect (Caha et al., 2025): inclusion presupposes contact, which in turn presupposes adjacency. The findings further indicate that finer interpretive nuances emerge from the encyclopedic component, especially from the interaction between Figure and Ground. Grounds denoting volumetric entities license all three readings (adjacency, contact, and inclusion), while Grounds denoting surface entities restrict interpretation to contact. Finally, we examine the relation between ‘em’ and complex prepositional phrases such as ‘dentro de’, showing how the interaction between nanosyntactic structure, encyclopedic knowledge, and pragmatic principles accounts for speakers' choice between these alternative strategies for expressing spatial relations in Brazilian Portuguese.
References
BAUNAZ, Lena et al. (Ed.). Exploring nanosyntax. Oxford University Press, 2018.
BENNETT, Brandon. Standpoint semantics: a framework for formalising the variable meaning of vague terms. Understanding Vagueness—Logical, Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. College Publications, 2011.
CAHA, Pavel. A default theory of default case. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, v. 9, n. 1, 2024.
CAHA, P. et al. Nanosyntax: state of the art and recent developments. In: CAHA, P. et al. Nanosyntax and the lexicalization algorithm. Oxford University press, 2025.
CAHA, Pavel. A local analysis of an apparent nonlocal allomorphy in Tamil. In: In: CAHA, P. et al. Nanosyntax and the lexicalization algorithm. Oxford University press, 2025.
CINQUE, Guglielmo; RIZZI, Luigi. The Cartography of Syntatic Structures. In: HEINE, B. & NARROG, H. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. New York, Oxford University Press, p. 51-65, 2010.
CHIERCHIA, Gennaro. Semântica. Trad. L. A. Pagani, L. Negri e R. Ilari. Campinas, SP:
Editora da UNICAMP, 2003.
COMRIE, Bernard; POLINSKY, Maria; RAJABOV, Ramazan. Tsezian languages. The languages of the Caucasus. London: Curzon, 1998.
CORTIULA, Maria. The nanosyntax of Friulian verbs. An analysis of the present and past in Tualis Friulian. PhD diss., Masaryk University, 2023.
FARIAS, Jair Gomes. Variação entre a, para e em no português brasileiro e no português europeu: algumas notas. Letras de hoje, v. 41, n. 1, 2006.
FERREIRA, M. B. Semântica: uma introdução ao estudo formal do significado. Editora Contexto, São Paulo, 2022.
FERREIRA, Thayse Letícia. Preposições espaciais como predicados instanciadores de kind: sobre a existência de entidades espaciais. ReVEL, edição especial, v. 19, n. 18, 2021.
GRICE, Herbert P. Logic and conversation. Cole et al. (Org.) Syntax and semantics 3: Speech arts, Brill, 1975. p. 41-58.
ILARI, R. et al. As preposições. In: ILARI, R.; NEVES, M. H. M. (Orgs.) Gramática do português culto falado no Brasil. Vol. II - Classes de Palavras e Processos de construção. São Paulo: Contexto, 2015.
JOHNSON, Mark; LAKOFF, George. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago press, 1980.
LANDAU, Barbara; JACKENDOFF, Ray. Whence and whither in spatial language and spatial cognition?. Behavioral and brain sciences, v. 16, n. 2, p. 255-265, 1993.
LEFEBVRE, Henri. The Production of Space. Trad. D. Nicholson-Smith Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991.
OLIVEIRA, Aparecida de Araújo; VIEIRA GOODGOD, Pedro Ivo. Validade empírica das redes de polissemia para o significado preposicional. Revista de estudos da linguagem, v. 26, n. 1, 2018.
PANTCHEVA, Marina Blagoeva. Decomposing path: The nanosyntax of directional expressions. PhD Thesis. University of Tromso, 2011.
PARTEE, Barbara H. Formal semantics: Origins, issues, early impact. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, v. 6, n. 1, p. 13, 2011.
PORTNER, Paul H. What is meaning?: Fundamentals of formal semantics. John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
RODRIGUES, Edilson; SANTOS, Paulo E.; LOPES, Marcos. Pinning down polysemy: A formalisation for a Brazilian Portuguese preposition. Cognitive systems research, v. 41, p. 84-92, 2017.
RODRIGUES, Edilson J. et al. Standpoint semantics for polysemy in spatial prepositions. Journal of Logic and Computation, v. 30, n. 2, p. 635-661, 2020.
SANTOS, Milton. A natureza do espaço: técnica e tempo, razão e emoção. São Paulo: Edusp, 2006.
STARKE, Michal. Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd, v. 36, n.1, p. 1-6, 2009.
STARKE, Michal; CORTIULA, Maria. Bearing the Brazilian cross. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem-ReVEL, v. 19, n. 18, p. 9-35, 2021.
SVENONIUS, P. Structural decomposition of spatial adpositions. Work. Papers Tromsø, Nor., 2012.
TALMY, Leonard. How language structures space. In: Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1983. p. 225-282.
URSINI, Francesco-Alessio. How space gets into language: a novel approach. In: Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science (9th: 2009). Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, 2010. p. 348-355.
URSINI, Francesco-Alessio; LONG, Haiping; ZHANG, Yue Sara. Polysemy and semantic relations in Italian spatial prepositions. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, v. 55, n. 108, 2022.
VANDELOISE, Claude. Are there spatial prepositions?. In: Space in Languages. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006. p. 139-154.
ZWARTS, Joost; WINTER, Yoad. Vector space semantics: A model-theoretic analysis of locative prepositions. Journal of logic, language and information, v. 9, n. 2, p. 169-211, 2000.