A wave of metaphors: image and visual metaphors in cartoons from a cognitive-discursive perspective

Solange Coelho Vereza,
Dalby Dienstbach
PDF

Abstract

This paper aligns with a field of research that deals with the use of multimodal metaphors from a cognitive-discursive perspective. In this context, we aim to investigate the role played by images in the instantiation of cross-domain mappings in a particular genre. Specifically, we describe and analyze the cognitive-discursive nature and functioning of visual metaphors in political and social cartoons. This paper first explores the concepts of image schemas, image metaphors, and visual metaphors, as well as the notion of metaphoricity in discourse. We then carry out the analysis of multimodal metaphors in a corpus of editorial cartoons that depict the Covid-19 pandemic, and other related issues within social and political contexts. Some of our findings suggest that cartoons often evoke multilayered off-line frames, image metaphors and conceptual metaphors in order to enhance the persuasive power of their semiotic arrangement, especially by inviting their audience to actively participate in meaning-construction processes

References

ADLER, J.; HILL, D. Doomed by cartoon: how cartoonist Thomas Nast and the New York Times brought down Boss Tweed and his ring of thieves. New York: Morgan James, 2008.

BARTHES, R. Rhetoric of the image. In: BARTHES, R. Image, music and text. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977, p. 32-51.

BARTKY, S. Femininity and domination: studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge, 1990.

BERBER SARDINHA, T. Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, v. 11, n. 2, p. 329-360, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-63982011000200004. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

BLACK, M. More about metaphor. In: ORTONY, A. (Ed.). Metaphor and thought. 2. Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. p. 19-41.

CAMERON, L. MetNet Group: the metaphor analysis project. Milton Keynes: The Open University, 2006. Retrieved from: http://creet.open.ac.uk/projects/metaphor-analysis/procedure.cfm. Access: 01 oct. 2021

CAMERON, L.; MASLEN, R. (Eds). Metaphor analysis: research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: The Open University, 2014.

CIENKI, A.; MÜLLER, C. (Eds.). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008.

DIENSTBACH, D. Por uma análise sistemática da metaforicidade no discurso. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, v. 18, n. 2, p. 287-306, 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-180202-7917. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

DUGALICH, N. Political cartoon as a genre of political discourse. Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, v. 9, n. 1, p. 158-172, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2018-9-1-158-172. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

DUNN, J. Modeling abstractness and metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol, v. 30, n. 4, p. 259-289, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1074801. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

DUQUE, P. H. A Covid-19 em charges: uma análise baseada em frames. Estudos Linguísticos e Literários, n. 69, p. 106-127, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9771/ell.v0i69.44290. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

FILLMORE, C. Frame Semantics. In: LINGUISTICS SOCIETY OF KOREA (Ed.). Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co, 1982. p. 111-137.

FORCEVILLE, C. Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Taylor & Francis, 1996.

FORCEVILLE, C. Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In: GIBBS R. (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2008. p. 462-482.

FORCEVILLE, C.; URIOS-APARISI, E. (Eds.). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2009.

GIBBS, R. Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In: GIBBS, R.; STEEN, G. (Eds). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999. p. 145-166.

GOATLY, A. The language of metaphors. London: Routledge, 1997.

GOATLY, A. Washing the brain: metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2007.

GRADY, J. Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. 1997. Dissertation (Ph.D. in Linguistics) ‒ Graduate Division, University of California, Berkeley, 1997.

HAMPE, B. Images schemas in Cognitive Linguistics: introduction. In: HAMPE, B. (Ed.). From perception to meaning: image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2005. p. 1-12.

HANDL, S. The conventionality of figurative language: a usage-based study. Tübingen: Narr, 2011.

JOHNSON, M. The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.

KOLLER, V. Brand images: multimodal metaphor in corporate branding messages. In: FORCEVILLE, C. and URIOS-APARISE, E. (Eds.). Multimodal Metaphors. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009. p. 45-72.

KÖVECSES, Z. Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

LAKOFF, G. Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987a.

LAKOFF, G. Image metaphors. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, v. 2, n. 3, p. 219-222, 1987b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0203_4. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.

LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.

LAKOFF, G.; TURNER, M. More than cool reason: a field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.

LANGACKER, R. Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

MANDLER, J. M. The spatial foundations of the conceptual system. Language and Cognition, v. 2, n.1, p. 21-44, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog.2010.002. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

MANDLER, J.; CÁNOVAS, C. On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition, v. 6, n. 4, p. 510-532, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2014.14. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

MÜLLER, C. Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and awaking: a dynamic view. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008.

NERLICH B.; HAMILTON, C.; ROWE, V. Conceptualising foot and mouth disease: the socio-cultural role of metaphors, frames and narratives. Metaphorik.de, n. 2, p. 90-107, 2002.

PAUWELS, P. Levels of metaphorization. In: GOOSSENS, L.; VANPARYS, J.; PAUWELS, P.; RUDZKA-OSTYN, B.; VANDENBERGEN, A. M. (Orgs.). By word of mouth: metaphor, metonymy and linguistic action in a cognitive perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1995. p. 125-158.

PRAGGLEJAZ GROUP. MIP: a method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1-39, 2007.

SAGAN, Carl. The demon-haunted world: science as a candle in the dark. Londres: Headline Books, 1997.

SEMINO, E. Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

STEEN, G. Metaphor in Bob Dylan's “Hurricane”: genre, language, and style. In: SEMINO, E.; CULPEPER, J. (Eds.). Cognitive stylistics: language and cognition in text analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002, p. 184-209.

STEEN, G. Metaphor in applied linguistics: four cognitive approaches. D.E.L.T.A., v. 22, n. especial, p. 21-44, 2006.

STEEN, G. Deliberate metaphor theory: basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-24, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0001. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

STEEN, G.; DORST, A.; HERRMANN, J. B.; KAAL, A. M.; KRENNMAYR, T.; PASMA, T. A method for linguistic metaphor identification: from MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010.

SZYMANSKI, D.; MOFFITT, L.; CARR, E. Sexual objectification of women: advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist, v. 39, n. 1, p. 6-38, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010378402. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

TALMY, L. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, v. 12, n. 1, p. 49-100, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

VAN MULKEN, M.; VAN HOOFT, A.; NEDERSTIGT, U. Finding the tipping point: visual metaphor and conceptual complexity in advertising. Journal of Advertising, v. 43, n. 4, 2014, p. 333-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2014.920283. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

VEREZA, S. Entrelaçando frames: a construção do sentido metafórico na linguagem em uso. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos, v. 55, n. 1, p. 109-124, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/cel.v55i1.8636598. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

VEREZA, S. Cry me a river: metaphoric hyperboles in the interface between discourse and cognition. Gragoatá, v. 21, n. 40, p. 175-196, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.v21i40.33380. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

VEREZA, S. A metáfora na linha de frente: mapeamentos de guerra na conceptualização da pandemia de Covid-19. Estudos Linguísticos e Literários, n. 69, p. 52–89, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9771/ell.v0i69.44288. Access: 02 oct. 2021.

VEREZA, S. The fabric of metaphor in discourse: interweaving cognition and discourse in figurative language. In: SOARES, A. (Ed.) Figurative language: intersubjectivity and usage. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2021. p. 339-356.

UNDERHILL, J. Creating worldviews: metaphor, ideology and language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2011.

ZOCCHIO, M.; BALLARDIN, E. Pequeno dicionário ilustrado de expressões idiomáticas. São Paulo: Mandioca, 1999.