• slot resmi
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot88
  • raja168
  • agenrp
  • slot gacor
  • nagarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • agenrp
  • raja168
  • fijislot
  • emas288
  • bos288
  • raja168
  • bos288
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • emas288
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • Argumentative and interactional dimensions of Textual Linguistics in digital environments

    Mayara Arruda Martins

    Abstract

    This review presents some fundamental concepts discussed in the live session entitled Argumentation and interaction in Textual Linguistics. From interfaces between Textual Linguistics and other scientific approaches, aspects, such as text, genre, interaction, and argumentative modalities, were discussed, in the convergence to the new modes of argumentation in digital contexts. Supported by authors, such as Adam (2019), Amossy (2017), Paveau (2015), and Charaudeau (2015), the participants of this roundtable managed to associate the modes of argumentation and interaction in digital contexts to criteria as text plan and communicative contract. Thus, the discussion undertaken by the professors during the roundtable involved argumentative, discursive, and interactional aspects, emphasizing the importance of working with an interdisciplinarity focused on the current studies in Textual Linguistics.

    References

    ADAM, J. M. Textos: tipos e protótipos. Trad. Mônica Magalhães Cavalcante et al. São Paulo, Contexto, 2019.

    ADAM, J. M.; PHILIPPE, G. Continuité et textualité. In. ADAM, J.-M. (org.). Faire Texte. Frontières Textuelles et Opérations de textualisation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Franché-Comté, 2015. p. 35-80.

    ARGUMENTAÇÃO e interação em Linguística Textual. Mesa redonda debatida por Mônica Magalhães Cavalcante, Ana Lúcia Tinoco Cabral e Maria Eduarda Giering, sob mediação de Mariza Angélica Paiva Brito, 2020. 1 vídeo (2h 27min 05s). Publicado pelo canal da Associação Brasileira de Linguística. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBcqw7LXclk&t=1118s. Acesso em: 15 mai 2020.

    AMOSSY, R. Apologia da polêmica. Trad. Mônica Magalhães Cavalcante et al. São Paulo: Contexto, 2017.

    BRAIT, B. O texto nas reflexões do Círculo e de Bakhtin. In: BATISTA, R.de O. O texto e seus conceitos. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2016. p.13-30.

    CAVALCANTE et al. O texto e suas propriedades: definindo perspectivas de análise. Revista (Con)Textos Linguísticos, v. 13, n. 25, 2019, p. 25-39.

    CHARAUDEAU, P. La maelstrom de l’interdiscours. In: SOULAGES, J.-C. (Org.). L’analyse de discours – sa place dans la sciences du langage et de la communication. (Homage à Patrick Charaudeau). Renns: Press Universitaires de Rennes, 2015.

    PAVEAU, M.-A. En naviguant en écrivant. Réflexions sur les textualités numériques. In: ADAM, J.-M. (org.). Faire Texte. Frontières Textuelles et Opérations de textualisation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Franché-Comté, 2015, p. 337 - 353.