Linguistic marker of schizotypy: a study on nominal reference

Monica de Freitas Frias Chaves; Cilene Rodrigues

doi:10.25189/rabralin.v21i1.2092

Linguistic marker of schizotypy: a study on nominal reference

Monica de Freitas Frias Chaves,

Cilene Rodrigues

V. 21, N. 1 (2022)
Enviado: out. 4, 2022
Publicado: dez. 30, 2022
DOI 10.25189/rabralin.v21i1.2092

PDF XML

Resumo

Comprometimentos semânticos são considerados identificadores linguísticos de transtorno de personalidade esquizotípica. Falhas na construção da referência de expressões nominais têm sido, especialmente, capazes de distinguir entre grupos de indivíduos com esquizofrenia, com alta-esquizotipia e grupo controle, e refletem dificuldades no uso de informação contextual linguística. Nosso estudo experimental investigou covariâncias entre traços de personalidade esquizotípica, em população não-clínica, e a interpretação de expressão nominal definida singular como referindo a espécie de objeto (leitura genérica) ou objeto específico (leitura específica). O experimento foi conduzido em português brasileiro, onde a leitura específica é a leitura default/forte de nominais definidos no singular, enquanto a leitura genérica é o sentido fraco, sendo dependente de pista contextual. Os resultados indicam associações entre a interpretação de nominal definido singular e dois traços de personalidade esquizotípica: afeto constrito (traço negativo) e experiências perceptuais incomuns (traço positivo). Os participantes em geral preferiram atribuir interpretações específicas a nominais definidos singulares. Participantes com pontuação alta em afeto constrito e baixa em experiências perceptuais incomuns, entretanto, mostraram preferência significativamente mais alta por essa leitura com efeito aditivo de contextos discursivos apresentando pistas para especificidade. Esse resultado sugere que traços esquizotípicos podem se manifestar na linguagem como uma tendência a manter o sentido forte.

Referências

AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: The Association, 2013.

ARIEL, M. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24, 65-87, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011567.

ARIEL, M. Accessing noun phrase antecedents. London: Routledge, 1990.

ARIEL, M. Interpreting anaphoric expressions: a cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics, 30, 3-42, 1994.

AUGUSTO, M. Marcação de número e genericidade: intepretação genérica na aquisição do PB. Letras de Hoje, 42, 35-51, 2007.

BARRERA, A.; HANDEL, A.; KONDEL, T.K.; LAWS, K.R. Formal Thought Disorder: self-report in non-clinical populations. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 15(1), 155–167, 2017.

BORA, E. Theory of mind and schizotypy: a meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research, 222, 97-103, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2020.04.024.

BOER, H. Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: syntactic projections and the lexicon. In MOORE, J.; POLINSKY, M. The nature of explanation in linguistic theory. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 31-67, 2003.

BORIK, O.; ESPINAL, M.T. Reference to kinds and to other generic expressions in Spanish: definiteness and number. The Linguistic Review, 32, 167-225, 2015.

CARLSON, G.M. Reference to kinds in English. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 1977.

CHAIKA, E., LAMBE, R. Cohesion in schizophrenic narratives, revisited. Journal of Communication Disorders, 22, 407-421, 1989.

CHAPMAN, L.J., CHAPMAN, J.P., & MILLER, G.A. A theory verbal behavior in schizophrenia. In MAHER, B.A. Progress in experimental personality research. New York: Academic Press. 49-77, 1964.

CHAMPAGNE-LAVAU, M.; STIP, E.; JOANETTE Y. Social cognition deficit in schizophrenia: accounting for pragmatic deficits in communication abilities? Current Psychiatry Reviews, 2, 309-315, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2174/157340006778018184.

CHIERCHIA, G.; MCCONNELL-GINET, S. Meaning and Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2000.

CHOMSKY, N. Language and thought. London: Moyer Bell, 1993.

CHOMSKY, N. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

CHOMSKY, N. The science of language: interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

CIMPIAN, A.; MARKMAN, E.M. Preschool children’s use of cues to generic meaning. Cognition, 107, 19-53, 2008.

CLARIDGE, G. Theoretical background and issues. In CLARIDGE, G. Schizotypy: Implications for Illness and Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3-18, 1997.

CLARIDGE, G.; BEECH, T. Fully and quasi-dimensional constructions of schizotypy. In Raine, A.; Lencz, T.; Mednick, S. A. Schizotypal Personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 192-216, 1995.

ÇOKAL, D.; SEVILLA, G.; JONES, W.S.; ZIMMERER, V.; DEAMER, F.; DOUGLAS, M.; SPENCER, H.; TURKINGTON, D.; FERRIER, N.; VARLEY, R.; WATSON, S.; HINZEN, W. The language profile of formal thought disorder. NPJ Schizophrenia, 4, 18, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-018-0061-9.

DAYAL, V. Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 393–450, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LING.0000024420.80324.67.

DEBBANÉ, M.; BARRANTES-VIDAL, N. Schizotypy from a developmental perspective. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 41(2), 386-395, 2015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbu175.

DITMAN, T.; KUPERBERG, G.R. The time course of building discourse coherence in schizophrenia: an ERP investigation. Psychophysiology, 44, 991-1001, 2007.

DOBROVIE-SORIN, C.; OLIVEIRA, R.P. Reference to kinds in Brazilian Portuguese: the definite singular vs. bare singulars. In Grønn, Atle Proceedings of SuB12, Oslo: ILOS. 107-121, 2008. ISBN 978-82-92800-00-3

DOCHERTY, N.M.; COHEN, A.S.; NIENOW, T.M., DINZEO, T.J.; DANGELMAIER, R.E. Stability of formal thought disorder and referential communication disturbances in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(3), 469–475, 2003. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-843X.112.3.469.

EYSENCK, H.J. The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1967.

FONSECA-PEDRERO, E.; FUMERO, A.; PAINO, M.; DE MIGUEL, A.; ORTUÑO-SIERRA, J.; LEMO-GIRÁLDEZ, S.; MUÑIZ, J. Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire: new sources of validity evidence in college students. Psychiatric Research, 219, 214–220, 2014. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.054.

GELMAN, S.A.; RAMAN, L. Preschool Children Use Linguistic Form Class and Pragmatic Cues to Interpret Generics. Child Development, 74. 308-325, 2003.

GIVÓN, T. Topic Continuity in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1983.

HARVEY, P.D.; WEINTRAUB, S.; NEALE, J.M. Speech competence of children vulnerable to psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10(3), 373–387, 1982. PMID:7175044.

HENRY, J.D.; BAILEY, P.E.; RENDELL P.G. Empathy, social functioning and schizotypy. Psychiatry Research, 160, 15-22, 2008.

HINZEN, W.; SHEEHAN, M. The philosophy of universal grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

HUMPHREY, M.K.; BRYSON , M.F.; GRIMSHAW, M. Metaphor processing in high and low schizotypal individuals. Psychiatry Research, 178, 290-294, 2010.

JOHNS, L.C.; VAN OS, J. The continuity of psychotic experience in the general population. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 1125-1141, 2001.

KIANG, M. Schizotypy and language: a review. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23(3), 193– 203, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.03.002.

KIMBLE, M.; LYONS, M.; O’DONNELL, B.; NESTOR, P.; NIZNIKIEWICZ, M.; TOOMEY, R. The effect of family status and schizotypy on electrophysiologic measures of attention and semantic processing. Biological Psychiatry, 47, 402-412, 2000.

KRIFKA, M.; PELLETIER; F.J.; CARLSON, G.; TER MEULEN, A.; CHIERCHIA, G.; LINK G. Genericity: an introduction. In Carlson, G.N.; Pelletier, F. J. (Eds.) The generic book. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 1-24, 1995.

KUPERBERG, G.R.; MCGUIRE, P.K.; DAVID, A.S. Reduced sensitivity to linguistic context in schizophrenic thought disorder: evidence from online monitoring for words in linguistically-anomalous sentences. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 423-434, 1998.

KUPERBERG, G.R.; KREHER, D.A.; GOFF, D.; MCGUIRE, P.K.; DAVID A.S. Building up linguistic context in schizophrenia: evidence from self-paced reading. Neuropsychology, 20, 442–452, 2006.

LANGDON, R.; COLTHEART, M. Recognition of metaphor and irony in young adults: the impact of schizotypal personality traits. Psychiatry Research, 125 (1), 9–20, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2003.10.005.

LENZENWEGER, M.F. Schizotaxia, schizotypy, and schizophrenia: Paul E. Meehl’s blueprint for the experimental psychopathology and genetics of schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 195–200, 2006.

LA FUENTE, I. Putting pronoun resolution in context: the role of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics in pronoun interpretation. PhD thesis, Université Paris Diderot, 2015.

LOPES, R. Bare Nouns and DP number agreement in the acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese. In Sagarra, N.; Toribio, A.J. Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Cambridge, MA: Cascadilla Press, 2006.

MARATSOS, M.P. The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children: an experimental study in language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 (1976).

MEEHL, P. E. Schizotaxia, Schizotypy, Schizophrenia. American Psychologist, 17, 827–838, 1962.

MEEHL, P.E. Toward an Integrated Theory of Schizotaxia, Schizotypy and Schizophrenia. Journal of Personality Disorders, 4, 1-99, 1990.

MORGAN, C.; BEDFORD, N.; ROSSELL, S.L. Evidence of semantic disorganization using semantic priming in individuals with high schizotypy. Schizophrenia Research, 84, 272-80, 2006.

MUNN, A.; SCHMITT, C. Bare nominals and the morpho-syntax of number. In Cresti, D.; Satterfield, T.; Tortora, C. Current issues in romance linguistics. Selected papers from the XXIX Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL). Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 217-231, 1999.

MUNN, A.; SCHMITT, C. Number and indefinites. Lingua, 115, 821-855, 2005.

MÜLLER, A. Genericity and the Denotation of Common Nouns in Brazilian Portuguese. D.E.L.T.A.,18, 287-308, 2002.

NUNN, J.; Peters, E. Schizotypy and patterns of lateral asymmetry on hemisphere- specific language tasks. Psychiatry Research, 103, 179-192, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165- 1781(01)00273-6.

PIETROSKI, P. The character of natural language semantics. In Barber, A. The epistemology of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 217–256, 2003.

RADO, S. Dynamics and classification of disordered behavior. American Journal of Psychiatry, 110, 406–416, 1953.

RAINE, A. The SPQ: A scale for the assessment of schizotypal personality based on DSM-III-R criteria. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 17(4), 555–564, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/17.4.555.

RAINE, A.; LENCZ, T.; MEDNICK, S.A.; SARNOFF, A. Schizotypal personality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

RAPP, A.; LANGOHR, K.; MUTSCHLER, D.; WILD, B. Irony and Proverb Comprehension in Schizophrenia: Do Female Patients ‘‘Dislike’’ Ironic Remarks? Schizophrenia Research and Treatment, 2014, 1-10, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/841086.

REYNOLDS, C.A.; RAINE, A.; MELLINGEN, K.; VENABLES, P.H.; MEDNICK, S.A. Three-factor model of schizotypal personality: invariance across culture, gender, religious affiliation, family adversity, and psychopathology. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26, 603–18, 2000.

ROCHESTER, S.; MARTIN, J.R. Crazy Talk: A Study of the Discourse of Schizophrenic Speakers. New York: Plenum Press, 1979.

RODRIGUEZ-FERRERA, S.; MCCARTHY, R.A.; MCKENNA, P.J. Language in schizophrenia and its relationship to formal thought disorder. Psychological Medicine, 31, 197–205, 2001.

RUECKERT, L.; NAYBAR, N. Gender differences in empathy: the role of the right hemisphere. Brain and Cognition, 67, 162-167, 2008.

SEVILLA, G.; ROSSELLÓ, J.; SALVADOR, R.; SARRÓ, S.; LÓPEZ-ARAQUISTAIN, L.; POMAROL-CLOTET, E.; HINZEN, W. Deficits in nominal reference identify thought disordered speech in a narrative production task. PLoS ONE, 13, 2018. e0201545. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201545.

STAINTON, R. Meaning and reference: some chomskynian themes. In Lepore, E.; Smith, B. Handbook of philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 913–940, 2006.

TOVAR, A.T.; SCHMEISSER, N.W.; GARÍ, S.A.; MOREY, M.C.; HINZEN, W. Language disintegration under conditions of severe formal thought disorder. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 134, 1-24, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.720.

WANG, Y.; NEUMANN, D.; SHUM, D.; LIU, W-H.; SHI, H.; YAN, C.; LUI, S.; ZHANG, Q.; LI, Z.; CHEUNG, E.; CHAN, R. Cognitive empathy partially mediates the association between negative schizotypy traits and social functioning. Psychiatry Research, 210(1), 62-68, 2013.

WANG, Y.; LUI, W-H.; LI, Z.; WEI, X-H.; JIANG, X-Q.; NEUMANN, D.L.; SHUM, D.H.; CHEUNG E.F.; CHAN, R.C. Dimensional schizotypy and social cognition: an fMRI imaging study. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 133, 2015. Doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00133.

PDF XML