Experimental evidence of the production of inflected infinitives by Brazilian Portuguese speakers

Marcello Modesto,
Marije Soto,
Aniela Improta França
PDF

Resumo

The Minimalist Program launched by N. Chomsky (1995) inspired reductionist accounts of Control phenomena, which tried to eliminate ‘PRO’ from the theory of grammar, treating it as a trace (copy) of movement (Martin 1996; O’Neil 1997; Hornstein 1999 et seq.). Such movement theories of Control are directly challenged by the use of inflected infinitives in Brazilian Portuguese (BP), as shown in Modesto (2010). Many supporters of the movement theory, however, have denied the empirical argument, making the claim that inflected infinitives “are not natural in BP” (Rodrigues & Hornstein 2013: 307), not belonging to BP’s “core grammar”. This study, then, presents two experiments in which production of nonfinite inflection is implicitly elicited in a pseudoword oral completion task. Participants from different linguistic geographic varieties (the cities of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo) heard the pseudoverb in its gerundive form and were then prompted to insert the pseudoverb in a sentence frame that would be compatible with both uninflected and inflected infinitive forms. Our results show 73.3% of participants inflected the infinitive to some degree when indirectly primed to do so, and that 40.9% did so, even when not primed. Results also show that while linearly distant plural markings (on the subject) did not influence behavior, adjacent morphosyntactic plural markings (on secondary predicates, for instance) did slightly increase the probability of inflection. Both priming effects and sensitivity to morphosyntactic context seem to indicate that nonfinite inflection is a productive, albeit variable, feature of BP speakers’ I-grammar.

Referências

BAAYEN, R. H.; DAVIDSON, D. J.; BATES, D. M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 390-412, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.

BOBALJIK, J. D.; LANDAU, I. Icelandic control is not A-movement: The case from case. Linguistic Inquiry 40, 113-132, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.1.113.

BOECKX, C.; HORNSTEIN, N. Reply to “Control is Not Movement”. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 269-280, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438903321663406.

BOECKX, C.; HORNSTEIN, N. Movement Under Control. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 431-452, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402625.

BOECKX, C.; HORNSTEIN, N. Control in Icelandic and Theories of Control. Linguistic Inquiry 37, 591-606, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.591.

CHOMSKY, N. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1981.

CHOMSKY, N. The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambrigde, MA, 1995.

CUNHA, C.; CINTRA, L. Nova Gramática do Português Contemporâneo. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Nova Fronteira, 1985.

DAVIES, W. D.; DUBINSKY, S. The Grammar of Raising and Control: A Course in Syntactic Argumentation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755693.

DUARTE, M. E. A perda do princípio “evite pronome” no português brasileiro, Unicamp Ph.D. dissertation, São Paulo, 1995.

FERREIRA, M. B. Hyperraising and null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 47: Collected Papers on Romance Syntax, 57-85, 2004.

FIGUEIREDO SILVA, M. C. A posição sujeito no português brasileiro: frases finitas e infinitivas. Campinas: Unicamp Press, 1996.

HORNSTEIN, N. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 69-96, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999553968.

HORNSTEIN, N. Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2001.

HORNSTEIN, N. On Control. In Randall Hendrick (ed.), Minimalist Syntax, 6-81. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003.

HORNSTEIN, N.; KOGUCHI, H. PRO-gate and Movement. In ARUNACHALAM, S.; KAISER, E.; WILLIAMS, A. (eds.), University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 101-114. University of Pennsylvania, 2003.

HORNSTEIN, N.; NUNES, J.; GROHMANN, K. K. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

HYNDMAN, R. J.; KHANDAKAR, Y. Automatic Time Series Forecasting: the forecast Package for R. Journal of Statistical Software 27(3), 2008. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v000.i00

HASTING, A. S.; KOTZ, S. A. & FRIEDERICI, A. D. Setting the Stage for Automatic Syntax Processing: The Mismatch Negativity as an Indicator of Syntactic Priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19(3), 386–400, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.3.386

KATO, M. A. A gramática do letrado: questões para a teoria gramatical. In Maria A. Marques & Erwin Koller (eds.), Ciências da Linguagem: 30 anos de investigação e ensino, 131-145. Braga: CEHUM (Universidade do Minho), 2005.

KUZNETSOVA, A.; BROCKHOFF, P. B.; CHRISTENSEN, R. H. B. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of statistical software 82(13), 1-26, 2017. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

LANDAU, I. Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.

LANDAU, I. Movement out of Control. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3), 471-498, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438903322247560.

LANDAU, I. Movement-Resistant Aspects of Control. In William D. Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising, 293-325. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.

LANDAU, I. A two-tiered theory of Control. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262028851.001.0001.

LEBEAUX, D. Anaphoric Binding and the Definition of PRO. Proceedings of North East Linguistics Society: Vol. 14: Iss. 1, Article 16, 1984.

LEDOUX, K.; TRAXLER, M. J.; SWAAB, T. Y. Syntactic priming in comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials. Psychol Sci. 18(2), 135-43, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01863.x.

LEMLE, M. Análise Sintática. São Paulo: Ática, 1984.

LENTH, R. lsmeans: Least-Squares Means. R package version 2.20-23. In http://CRAN.R-project.org/package¼lsmeans, 2015.

LIGHTFOOT, D. How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.

MANZINI, M. R. On Control and Control Theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 14(3), 421-446, 1983. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178338.

MARTIN, R. A. A minimalist theory of PRO and control. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 1996.

MARCILESE, M.; RODRIGUES, E. S.; AUGUSTO, M. R. A.; HENRIQUE, K. S. Efeitos de distância linear e marcação no processamento da concordância verbal variável no PB / Linear distance and markedness effects in variable subject-verb agreement processing in BP. Revista Estudos da Linguagem, Belo Horizonte, v.25, n.3, 1291-1325, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.25.3.1291-1325.

MAURER Jr., T. H. O infinitivo flexionado português: estudo histórico-descritivo. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, 1968.

MILLER, D. G. Nonfinite Structures in Theory and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

MODESTO, M. What Brazilian Portuguese says about control: remarks on Boeckx & Hornstein. Syntax 13(1), 78-96, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2009.00136.x.

MODESTO, M. Does inflection matter? A few more notes on BP inflected infinitives. Revista Linguística 13(2), 1-19, 2017. https://doi.org/10.31513/LINGUISTICA.2017.V13N2A13508.

MODESTO, M. Inflected infinitives in Brazilian Portuguese and the theory of control. In Ana Lúcia Santos & Anabela Gonçalves (eds.), Complement Clauses in Portuguese: Syntax and Acquisition, 59-100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co., 2018. https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.17.03mod.

MODESTO, M.; MAIA, M. Representation and Processing of the Inflected Infinitive in Brazilian Portuguese: an eye-tracking study. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem 25(3), 1183-1224, 2017. https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.25.3.1183-1224.

NEGRÃO, E. V. Anaphora in Brazilian Portuguese complement structures. WI: University of Wisconsin Ph.D. dissertation, 1986.

NUNES, J. Inherent Case as a Licensing Condition for A-movement: The Case of Hyper-raising Constructions in Brazilian Portuguese, Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 7, 83-108, 2008. https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.129.

O’NEIL, J. H. Means of control: Deriving the properties of PRO in the Minimalist Program. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., 1997.

PERINI, M. A. Gramática descritiva do português. São Paulo: Ed. Ática, 1995.

QUICOLI, A. C. Inflection and parametric variation: Portuguese vs. Spanish. In Robert Freidin (ed.), Current issues in comparative grammar, 46-80. Amsterdam: Springer, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94- 009-0135-3_2.

RODRIGUES, C. Agreement and Flotation in Partial and Inverse Partial Control Configurations. In William D. Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising, 213-229. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.

RODRIGUES, C.; HORNSTEIN, N. Epicene agreement and inflected infinitives when the data is “under Control”: A reply to Modesto (2010). Syntax 16, 292-309, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12006.

SIGURÐSSON, H. A. Icelandic Case-Marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical Arguments. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 327-363, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134679.

TRAXLER, M. J.; FOSS, D. J.; SEELY, R. E.; KAUP, B.; MORRIS, R. K. Priming in sentence processing: Intralexical spreading activation, schemas, and situation models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29(6), 581–594, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026416225168.

WAGERS, M. W.; LAU, E. F.; PHILLIPS, C. Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), 206–237, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.002.