Argumentação multimodal: desafios e tendências recentes. Uma introdução ao número especial

Referências

ABDEL-RAHEEM, A. Mental Model Theory as a Model for Analysing Visual and Multimodal Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, v. 155, p. 303-320, 2020. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.012

ANGENOT, M. Dialogues de sourds. Paris: Mille et une nuits/Fayard, 2008.

BATEMAN, J.; WILDFEUER, J.; HIIPPALA, T. Multimodality: Foundations, Research and Analysis – A Problem-Oriented Introduction. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2017. DOI 10.1515/9783110479898.

BIRDSELL, D.; GROARKE, L. Toward a Theory of Visual Argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1-10, 1996.

BRAET, A. The Enthymeme in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: From Argumentation Theory to Logic. Informal Logic, v. 19, n. 2&3, p. 101-117, 1999. DOI https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v19i2.2322

CAREL, M. Vers une formalisation de la théorie de l'argumentation dans la langue. Thesis (Doctorate in Linguistics). France: École des hautes études en sciences sociales, 1992.

CAREL, M. L’Entrelacement argumentatif. France: Honoré Champion Éditeur, 2011.

COOK, G. The Discourse of Advertising. London, UK, and New York, NY: Routledge, 1992.

EEMEREN, F. van; GROOTENDORST, R. Unexpected Premises: Part I. The Journal of the American Forensic Association, v. 19, n. 2, p. 97-106, 1982.

EEMEREN, F. van; GROOTENDORST, R. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Floris Publications, 1984.

FAIRCLOUGH, I.; FAIRCLOUGH, N. Practical Reasoning in Political Discourse: The UK Government’s Response to the Economic Crisis in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report. Discourse & Society, v. 22, n. 3, p. 243–68, 2011. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395439

FAIRCLOUGH, N.; FAIRCLOUGH, I. Political discourse analysis. New York: Routledge, 2012.

FAUCONNIER, G.; TURNER, M. The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books, 2003.

FETERIS, E.; GROARKE, L.; PLUG, J. Strategic Maneuvering with Visual Arguments in Political Cartoon. In: FETERIS, E.; GARSSEN, B.; SNOECK-HENKEMANS, F. (org.) Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer, 2011, p. 59-74.

FLEMING, D. Can Pictures Be Arguments? Argumentation and Advocacy, v. 33, n. 1, p. 11-22, 1996.

FOGOLARI, L. A. O Gênero infográfico: Uma análise sociorretórica. Dissertation (Masters in Language Sciences) – Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Tubarão, 2009. Available in: https://www.riuni.unisul.br/handle/12345/4596.

FORCEVILLE, C. Non-Verbal and Multimodal Metaphor in a Cognitivist Framework: Agendas for Research. In: FORCEVILLE, C.; URIOS-APARISI, E. (org.) Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton, 2009, p. 19-44.

FORCEVILLE, C.; CLARK, B. Can Pictures Have Explicatures? Linguagem Em (Dis)Curso, v. 14, n. 3, p. 451-472, 2014. DOI https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-140301-0114

GONÇALVES-SEGUNDO, P.R. Multimodal metaphors and practical argumentation: discussing rhetorical effects and modes of articulation between modalities / Metáforas multimodais e argumentação prática: discutindo efeitos retóricos e modos de articulação entre modalidades. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, v. 28, n. 2, p. 801–844, 2020. DOI https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.28.2.801-844.

GONÇALVES-SEGUNDO, P. R. Argumentação multimodal: múltiplos olhares para um objeto complexo. In: GONÇALVES-SEGUNDO, P. R.; PIRIS, E. L. Estudos de Linguagem, Argumentação e Discurso. Campinas, SP: Pontes Editores, 2021, p. 73-109.

GROARKE, L. Toward a Pragma-Dialectics of Visual Argument. In: EEMEREN, F. H. van (org.). Advances in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam: Vale Press/Sic Sat, 2002. p. 137-151.

GROARKE, L. Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why Does it Matter? Argumentation, v. 29, n. 2, p. 133–155, 2015. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9336-0

HITCHCOCK, D. On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and on Critical Thinking. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017.

HOVEN, P. van den. The Narrator and the Interpreter in Visual and Verbal Argumentation. In: EEMEREN, F. H. van; GARSSEN, B. (org.) Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer, 2012, p. 257-71. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_17

HOVEN, P. van den. Cognitive Semiotics in Argumentation: A Theoretical Exploration. Argumentation, v. 29, n. 2, p. 157-76, 2015. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9330-6

HYLAND, K. Teaching and Researching Writing. Harlow, UK: Pearson, 2009.

JOHNSON, R. Why ‘Visual Arguments’ Aren’t Arguments. In: BLAIR, A.; JOHNSON, R.; HANSEN, H.; TINDALE, C. (org.). Informal Logic at 25: Proceedings of the Windsor Conference. Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, p. 1-13, 2003.

KECSKÉS, I. A Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach to Situation-Bound Utterances. Journal of Pragmatics, v. 32, n. 5, p. 605-625, 2000. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00063-6

KIILI, C.; SMITH, B.; Räikkönen, E.; MARTTUNEN, M. Students’ Interpretations of a Persuasive Multimodal Video About Vaccines. Journal of Literacy Research, v. 53, n. 2, p. 196-218, 2021. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X211009296

KJELDSEN, J. Pictorial Argumentation in Advertising: Visual Tropes and Figures as a Way of Creating Visual Argumentation. In: EEMEREN, F. H. van; GARSSEN, B. (org.) Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer, 2012, 239-55.

KJELDSEN, J. Virtues of Visual Argumentation: How Pictures Make the Importance and Strength of an Argument Salient. In: MOHAMMED, D.; Lewiński, M. (org.) Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th OSSA Conference. Windsor: Scholarship at UWindsor, 2013.

KJELDSEN, J. The Rhetoric of Thick Representation: How Pictures Render the Importance and Strength of an Argument Salient. Argumentation, v. 29, n. 2, p. 197-215, 2015. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9342-2.

KJELDSEN, J. Visual rhetorical argumentation. Semiotica, v. 2018, n. 220, p. 69–94, 26 jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0136.

KJELDSEN, J.; HESS, A. Experiencing multimodal rhetoric and argumentation in political advertisements: a study of how people respond to the rhetoric of multimodal communication. Visual Communication, v. 20, n. 3, p. 327–352, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211013399.

KRESS, G.; Van Leeuwen, t. Multimodal Discourse. The Modes of Media of Contemporary Communication. London, UK: Arnold, 2001.

KRESS, G.; VAN LEEUWEN, T. Reading images: the grammar of visual design. 2. ed. London: Routledge, 2006.

LAKOFF, George; JOHNSON, Mark. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

LEAL, V. C. Análise do gênero infográfico no Jornal Digital Folha de São Paulo com base nos pressupostos da retórica visual. 2021. Dissertation (Masters in Languages) – Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, 2021.

MACAGNO, F.; WALTON, D. Practical Reasoning Arguments: A Modular Approach. Argumentation, v. 32, n. 4, p. 519–547, 2018. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-9450-5.

MACAGNO, F.; PINTO, R. Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory. Argumentation, v. 35, n. 1, p. 141-176, 2021. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09525-z.

MACHIN, D.; MAYR, A. How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2012.

MARTIN, J. R; WHITE, P. R. R. The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

MEYER, M. Principia rhetorica: une théorie générale de l’argumentation. Paris : Fayard, 2008.

PATTERSON, S. W. “A picture held us Captive”: The later Wittgenstein on visual argumentation. Cogency, v. 2, n. 2, 2010. Disponível em: http://cogency.udp.cl/index.php/cogency/article/view/234.

PAVEAU, M. A. Análise do discurso digital: dicionário das formas e das práticas. Campinas/SP: Pontes Editores, 2021.

PERELMAN, C.; OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, L. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.

PLANTIN, C. L’argumentation. Paris: PUF, 2005.

POLLAROLI, C.; ROCCI, A. The argumentative relevance of pictorial and multimodal metaphor in advertising. Journal of Argumentation in Context, v. 4, n. 2, p. 158-199, 2015. doi https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.4.2.02pol.

POPA, E. O. We Have Yet to See the “Visual Argument”. Multimodal Communication, v. 5, n. 2, P. 79-92, 2016. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2016-0016

RIGOTTI, E.; MORASSO, S. G. Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components. Argumentation, v. 24, n. 4, p. 489–512, 2010. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-010-9190-7

ROCCI, A.; Mazzali-Lurati, S.; Pollaroli, C. Is This the Italy We like? Multimodal Argumentation in a Fiat Panda TV Commercial. In: PENNOCK-SPECK, B.; SAZ-RUBIO, M. del (org.) The Multimodal Analysis of Television Commercials. València, Spain: Publicacions de la Universitat de València, 2013, p. 157-187.

ROQUE, G. Visual Argumentation: A Further Reappraisal. In: EEMEREN, F. H. van; GARSSEN, B. (org.) Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer, 2012, p. 273-88.

ROQUE, G. Should Visual Arguments be Propositional in Order to be Arguments? Argumentation, v. 29, n. 2, p. 177-195, 2015. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9341-3

SEIXAS, R. Entre a retórica do impeachment e a do golpe: análise de lógicas argumentativas na doxa política brasileira. Thesis (Doctorate in Linguistic Studies) – Faculdade de Letras, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Linguísticos, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2019.

SERAFIS, D.; GRECO, S.; POLLAROLI, C.; JERMINI-MARTINEZ SORIA, C.. Towards an integrated argumentative approach to multimodal critical discourse analysis: evidence from the portrayal of refugees and immigrants in Greek newspapers. Critical Discourse Studies, v. 17, n. 5, p. 545–565, 2020. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1701509.

SPERBER, D.; WILSON, D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 1995.

TOULMIN, S. The uses of argument. Updated ed. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

TSERONIS, A. Multimodal argumentation: Beyond the verbal/visual divide. Semiotica, v. 2018, n. 220, p. 41-67, 2018. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0144.

TSERONIS, A. From visual rhetoric to multimodal argumentation: exploring the rhetorical and argumentative relevance of multimodal figures on the covers of The Economist. Visual Communication, v. 20, n. 3, p. 374–396, 2021. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211005498.

TSERONIS, A; FORCEVILLE, C. (Orgs.). Introduction. Argumentation and Rhetoric in Visual and Multimodal Communication. In: TSERONIS, A; FORCEVILLE, C. (Orgs.). Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017, p. 2-24.

VAN DIJK, T. A. Ideologia y discurso. Una introducción multidisciplinaria. Barcelona: Ariel, 2003.

VAN LEEUWEN, T. Introducing Social Semiotics. London, UK, and New York, NY: Routledge, 2005.

VAN POPPEL, Lotte. The Study of Metaphor in Argumentation Theory. Argumentation, v. 35, n. 1, p. 177-208, 2021. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09523-1.

VEREZA, S. Entrelaçando frames: a construção do sentido metafórico na linguagem em uso. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos, v. 55, n. 1, p. 109-124, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/cel.v55i1.8636598.

WALTON, D. What is Reasoning? What Is an Argument? The Journal of Philosophy, v. 87, n. 8, p. 399-419, 1990. DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/2026735.

WALTON, D.; REED, C.; MACAGNO, F. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

WHARTON, T. Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

WU, T. Reasoning and Appraisal in Multimodal Argumentation: Analyzing Building a community of shared future for humankind. Chinese Semiotic Studies, v. 16, n. 3, p. 419-438, 2020. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2020-0023

YUS, F. Inferring from Comics: A Multi-Stage Account. Quaderns de Filologia. Estudis de Comunicació, v. 3, p. 223-249, 2008.

ŽAGAR, I. Ž. Methodological Problems in Analysing Non-verbal Arguments: The Case of Visual Argumentation. In: SUKHOVA, N. V.; DUBROVSKAYA, T.; LOBINA, Y. A. (orgs.). Multimodality, Digitalization and Cognitivity in Communication and Pedagogy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, p. 49-69. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84071-6_4