A análise do discurso fílmico sob a perspectiva textual-linguística e multimodal

Leonardo Antonio Soares
PDF

Resumo

O significado em filme surge da interação de múltiplas modalidades, como imagens, sons, música, gestos, efeitos de câmera, etc., que são desencadeados pelo processo de edição, que muitas vezes resulta em uma ordem cronológica e linear. A interação das modalidades, por sua vez, resulta em um texto narrativo cuja compreensão e interpretação requerem a participação ativa do espectador. O objetivo deste artigo é estabelecer uma análise de filmes baseada em uma perspectiva textual-linguística multimodal. Sendo assim, a interação das modalidades no discurso é de interesse central, uma vez que são as interrelações entre os diferentes recursos semióticos que são decisivas para a estrutura geral e coerência de um filme e que, portanto, respondem por seu significado e interpretação como texto. Essa construção e atribuição de significado que se desdobra dentro do discurso é também um processo de raciocínio abdutivo, podendo ser descrita em termos de inferências. As estratégias inferenciais que operam durante a interpretação são, então, outro principal foco analítico. As análises demonstram que, como um artefato que se desdobra espacialmente, temporalmente e dinamicamente, o filme é um documento multimodal cujos recursos semióticos interagem e operam de acordo com vários princípios na busca de criar um potencial de significado geral.

Referências

ASHER, N; LASCARIDES, A. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press. 2003.

BALDRY, A. P; THIBAULT, P. Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. A Multimedia Toolkit and Coursebook. Equinox. 2006.

BATEMAN, J. A. Towards a Grande Paradigmatique of Film: Christian Metz Reloaded. Semiotica. 13–64. 2007.

BATEMAN, J. A. Filmische Textualitat jenseits der narrativen Instanz. In J. Bateman, M. Kepser and M. Kuhn, eds., Film, Text, Kultur. Beitrage zur Textualitat des Films, Ed. Schuren, pp. 88–138. 2013.

BATEMAN, J. A; RONDHUIS, K. Coherence Relations: Towards a General Specification. In. Discourse Processes, 24, 3–49. 1997.

BATEMAN, J. A; SCHMIDT, K.H. Multimodal Film Analysis: How Films Mean. Routledge. 2011.

BAZIN, A. What Is Cinema. Essays selected and translated by Hugh Gray. University of California Press. 1967.

BORDWELL, D. Narration in the Fiction Film. Routledge. 1985.

BORDWELL, D. Making Meaning. Inference and Rhetoric in the Interpretation of Cinema. Harvard University Press. 1989.

BORDWELL, D. Neo-Structuralist Narratology and the Functions of Filmic Storytelling, in M.L. Ryan, ed. Narrative Across Media. The Languages of Storytelling. University of Nebraska Press, pp. 203–219. 2004.

BORDWELL, D. The Way Hollywood Tells It. Story and Style in Modern Movies. University of California Press. 2006.

BORDWELL, D. Poetics of Cinema. Ed. Taylor & Francis Group. 2008.

BORDWELL, D. Cognitive Theory. In P. Livingston and C. Plantinga, eds. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film, Routledge, pp. 356–367. 2009.

BORDWELL, D; STAIGER, J; THOMPSON, K. The Classical Hollywood Cinema. Film Style & Mode of Production to 1960. Ed. Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1985.

BORDWELL, D; THOMPSON, K. Film Art: An Introduction. Ed McGraw Hill. 2001.

EISENSTEIN, S. Film Form. In. Essays in Film Theory. Edited and translated by Jay Leyda. Harvest Book. 1949.

FORCEVILLE, C. J. Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis: A Multimedia Toolkit and Coursebook. In. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(6), 1235–1238. 2007.

HALLIDAY, M. A. K. Language and a Social Semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold, 1978.

HALLIDAY, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 1994. HALLIDAY, M. A. K.; MATTHIESSEN, C. M. I. M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3. ed. London: Ed. Arnold, 2004.

HALLIDAY, M. A. K.; MATTHIESSEN, C. M. I. M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4. ed. New York: Ed. Routledge, 2013.

HARRIS, Z. Discourse Analysis. In. Language, 28, 1–30. 1952.

HOBBS, J. R. Coherence and Coreference. In. Cognitive Science, 3(1), 67–82. 1979.

HOBBS, J. R. Literature and Cognition, Lecture Notes. 1990.

JEWITT, C. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodality. Ed. Routledge. 2009.

KRACAUER, S. From Caligari to Hitler. A Psychological History of the German Film. Princeton University Press .2004.

KRESS, G. Multimodality. A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Ed. Routledge. 2010.

KRESS, G; VAN LEEUWEN, T. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Ed. Routledge. 1996.

KRESS, G; VAN LEEUWEN, T. Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Ed. Arnold. 2001.

LASCARIDES, A; ASHER, N. Temporal Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Common-Sense Entailments. 1991. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00986208. Acesso: 18 nov. 2020.

LASCARIDES, A; ASHER, N. Segmented Discourse Representation Theory: Dynamic Semantics with Discourse Structure. In. H. Bunt and R. Muskens, eds. Computing Meaning: Volume 3’, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 87–124. 2007.

LUNDQUIST, L. Coherence in Scientific Texts. In W. Heydrich, F. Neubauer, J. S. Petofi and E. Sozer, eds., Connexity and Coherence. Analysis of Text and Discourse, de Gruyter, pp. 122–149. 1989.

METZ, C. Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. Ed. University of Chicago

Press. 1974.

METZ, C. The Impersonal Enunciation, or the Site of Film. In W. Buckland, ed., The Film Spectator: From Sign to Mind. Ed. Amsterdam University Press, pp. 140–163. 1995.

O’HALLORAN, K. Interdependence, Interaction and Metaphor in MultiSemiotic Texts. In. Social Semiotics, 9(3), 317–354. 1999.

O’HALLORAN, K. Visual Semiosis in Film. In K. O’Halloran, ed., Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. Ed. Continuum, pp. 109–130. 2004.

PEIRCE, C. S., HARTSHORNE, C; WEISS, P. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Ed. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 1979.

PUDOVKIN, V. Film Technique and Film Acting. Ed. Bonanza Books. Republished by Grove, New York, (1926) 1960.

STOCKL, H. (2004), In Between Modes. Language and Image in Printed Media. In. E. Ventola, C. Charles and M. Kaltenbacher, eds., Perspectives on Multimodality. Ed. Benjamins, pp. 9–30. 2004.

TSENG, C. Cohesion in Film and the Construction of Filmic Thematic Configuration: A Functional Perspective. PhD thesis, University of Bremen. 2009.

TSENG, C. Cohesion in Film: Tracking Film Elements. Ed. Palgrave Macmillan. London. 2013.

TSENG, C; BATEMAN, J. A. Chain and Choice in Film Narrative: An Analysis of Multimodal Narrative Construction in The Fountain. In C. Hoffmann, ed., Narrative Revisited: Telling a Story in the Age of New, Multimodal Media. Ed. John Benjamins, pp. 213–244. 2010.

TSENG, C; BATEMAN, J. A. Multimodal Narrative Construction. In. Christopher Nolan’s Memento. A Description of Analytic Method. Journal of Visual Communication, 11(1), 91–119. 2012.

VAN DIJK, T. Discourse and Communication: New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media Discourse and Communication. Ed. Gruyter. 1985.

VAN LEEUWEN, T. Conjunctive Structure in Documentary Film and Television. Ed. Continuum, 5(1), 76–114. 1991.

VAN LEEUWEN, T. Moving English: The Visual Language of Film. In S. Goodman and D. Graddol, eds. Redesigning English—New Texts, New Identities. Ed. Routledge, pp. 81–105. 1996.

VAN LEEUWEN, T. Speech, Music, Sound. Ed. Macmillan Palgrave. London. 1999.

VAN LEEUWEN, T. Introducing Social Semiotics. Ed. Routledge. NY. 2005.

WIKIPEDIA: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joker_(filme) . Acesso: 16. jan. 2021.

WILDFEUER, J. More than WORDS: Semantic Continuity in Moving Images. In. Online Magazine of the Visual Narrative, 13(4), 181–203. 2012.

WILDFEUER, J. Der Film als Text. Ein Definitionsversuch aus linguistischer Sicht. In J. Bateman, M. Kepser and M. Kuhn, eds. Film, Text, Kultur. Beitrage zur Textualitat des Films’, Schuren, pp. 32–57. 2013.

WILDFEUER, J. Film Discourse interpretation: towards a new paradigm for multimodal film analysis. Ed. Routledge. New York. 2014.