• bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • dewirp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • nagarp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot gacor
  • slot88
  • raja168
  • agenrp
  • slot gacor
  • nagarp
  • rodarp
  • rodarp
  • agenrp
  • raja168
  • fijislot
  • emas288
  • bos288
  • raja168
  • bos288
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • raja168
  • emas288
  • agenrp
  • agenrp
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • bos288
  • El futuro se repite: priming effects in Spanish future expressions

    Luana Lamberti,
    Hugo Salgado

    Resumo

    Spanish shows variation between two future expressions. The synthetic future (SF) is marked morphologically while the periphrastic future (PF) is constructed with the verb ir ‘to go’ and an infinitive. Previous studies have described the semantic factors that determine the use of these expressions. The effects of priming in the selection of these expressions have yet to be addressed. Our results showed that a combination of factors contributes to the occurrence of the SF: priming effect; certainty; and verb frequency. We demonstrated that cognitive factors in combination with semantic ones should be taken into consideration when talking about the variation between the SF and the PF in Spanish. Our study also provides evidence for the fact that the obsolescing construction, the SF, will have a stronger priming effect in the larger process of language variation and change. Our work offers an important addition to the literature about the effects of persistence and entrenchment in language since we demonstrated that speakers are sensitive to contextual activation and language use factors.

    Referências

    AARON, J. E. A Certain Future: Epistemicity, Prediction, and Assertion in Iberian Spanish Future Expression. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, v.4, n.2 p. 215-240, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2014-1166

    ALMEIDA, M.; M. DÍAZ. Aspectos sociolingüísticos de un cambio gramatical: la expresión de futuro. Estudios Filológicos, v.33, p. 7-22, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0071-17131998003300001

    BLAS ARROYO, J. L . 2008. The Variable Expression of Future Tense in Peninsular Spanish: The Present (and Future) of Inflectional Forms in the Spanish Spoken in a Bilingual Region. Language Variation and Change, v.20, n.1, p.85-126, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439450800001X

    DAVIES, M. A Frequency Dictionary of Spanish: Core Vocabulary for Learners. Routledge Frequency Dictionaries. New York ; London: Routledge, 2006.

    FERNÁNDEZ RAMÍREZ, S. [1940-1950] Gramática española, 4. El verbo y la oración (comp de I. Bosque). Madrid: Arco/Libros, 1986.

    FLEISCHMAN, S. The Future in Thought and Language. Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    KANY, C. E. American-Spanish Syntax. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1945

    LANGACKER, R. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.

    LEECH, G., HUNDT, M., MAIR, C.; SMITH, N. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    MEYER, E. D.; SCHVANEVELDT, W. R. Facilitation in recognising pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, v.90, n.2, p. 227-234, 1971.

    MORENO FERNÁNDEZ, F., CESTERO MANCERA, A. M., MOLINA MARTOS, I; PAREDES GARCÍA, F. La lengua hablada en Alcalá de Henares: Corpus PRESEEA – Alcalá. I, Hablantes de Instrucción Superior. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá, 2002.

    ROSEMEYER, M. How Usage Rescues the System: Persistence as Conservation. In: ADLI, A., GARCÍA, G. M; KAUFMANN, G. (Eds.). Variation in Language: System- and Usage-Based Approaches. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter, 2015, p.289–311.

    ROSEMEYER, M.; SCHWENTER, S. A. Entrenchment and Persistence in Language Change: The Spanish Past Subjunctive. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, v.15, n.1, p.167-204, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0047

    SAMPER, J. A., HERNÁNDEZ CABRERA, C. E; TROYA, M. Macro-corpus de la norma lingüística culta de las principales ciudades del mundo hispánico. Canarias: Universidad de las Palmas, 1998.

    SEDANO, M. El futuro morfológico y la expresión ir a + infinitivo en el español hablado de Venezuela. Verba, v.21, p.44-66, 1994.

    SEDANO, M. Importancia de los datos cuantitativos en el estudio de las expresiones de futuro. Revista Signos, v.39, n.61, p.283-296, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342006000200007

    SZMRECSANYI, B. Language Users as Creatures of Habit: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Persistence in Spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, v.1, n.1, p.113-149, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.113